Harry’s authorized crew mentioned that they had initiated the authorized problem in September of final 12 months however determined to make that info public now “in order to set the facts straight” due to a leak in a British tabloid newspaper.
In explicit, Harry’s privately funded US safety crew “cannot replicate the necessary police protection needed” whereas they go to the UK, the consultant added.
The declare follows an incident in London in the summer season of 2021 when the prince’s safety was compromised as he left a charity occasion, the assertion added.
According to the authorized consultant, the Duke “first offered to pay personally for UK police protection for himself and his family in January of 2020 at Sandringham.” The consultant mentioned that supply was dismissed.
The authorized consultant additionally mentioned the duke “remains willing to cover the cost of security, as not to impose on the British taxpayer.”
After one other try to negotiate on the difficulty was rejected, Harry sought a judicial evaluation — a authorized problem to the lawfulness of selections taken by a public physique, in this case the Home Office — in September 2021, the assertion mentioned.
“The UK will always be Prince Harry’s home and a country he wants his wife and children to be safe in. With the lack of police protection, comes too great a personal risk. Prince Harry hopes that his petition — after close to two years of pleas for security in the UK — will resolve this situation,” the assertion mentioned.
According to a spokesperson for the Duke of Sussex, his crew is presently submitting paperwork which is able to summarize the grounds for contesting the Home Office determination.
Asked concerning the assertion from Harry’s authorized representatives, a authorities spokesperson mentioned: “The UK government’s protective security system is rigorous and proportionate. It is our long-standing policy not to provide detailed information on those arrangements. To do so could compromise their integrity and affect individuals’ security.
“It would additionally not be acceptable to touch upon the element of any authorized proceedings.”
CNN’s Arnaud Siad contributed to this report.